Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Little v. Copeland-Little et al
as 4:2023cv02081
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant:
Attorney Tony Copeland-Little, Doctor Matthew Gaskins, Prosecutor Kernard Redmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Little v. Cutchin et al
as 4:2023cv01697
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant:
Chesterfield County, Judge Paul M. Burch, Judge Roger M. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
McFarlin v. Harris et al
as 2:2017cv03215
Plaintiff:
Shawndell Monte McFarlin
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris and Redmond K Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kidd v. Kenard
as 5:2016cv00670
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Kidd
Defendant:
Redmond Kenard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ham v. Sly et al
as 6:2012cv02998
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ham
Defendant:
James Sly, Assistant Warden Nolan, Warden McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Forbes v. Santiago et al
as 1:2010cv01770
Plaintiff:
Raymond L Forbes
Defendant:
E Santiago, J Redmond and MM Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond v. Lexington et al
as 8:2010cv01312
Defendant:
County Of Lexington and Lexington County Food Service Providers
Plaintiff:
Eric Redmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar et al v. Lexington, County of et al
as 8:2010cv01178
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dunbar, Angelo Brown, Troy Griffin and others
Defendant:
Lexington, County of and Lexington County Food Service Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond v. Schwartz et al
as 3:2010cv00576
Defendant:
Micheal A Schwartz, Lane Cribb and Carter Weaver
Plaintiff:
Josh Redmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Jones v. Glover et al
as 1:2009cv02670
Plaintiff:
Daniel Archie Jones
Defendant:
Samuel B Glover , Henry McMaster and Kernard Redmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
