Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Jackson v. Director
as 5:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Reidie Jackson
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Reidie James Jackson
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin, Michael Britt, Paige Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv15959
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Director Mueller, Lt. Latham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeff Allen v. Timothy Reidy, et al
as 23-2144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFF V. ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY REIDY, Lieutenant, JAHAIRA LOPEZ, Sergeant, OFFICER MUBAYED and others
Davis v. Nurse Jayne et al
as 1:2023cv01668
Plaintiff:
Terrell L. Davis
Defendant:
Nurse Jayne, Nurse Cosuelo, Nurse Elida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Derenell Hill and Rose Hill
Defendant:
John Idleburg, C. Clouse, C. Crockett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luster v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lee Luster
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Chris Nanos, Unknown Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Thomas M James
Defendant:
David Shinn, Diana Labar, Jillian Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Cruz et al
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Reidie Jackson and Reidie James Jackson
Defendant:
Ray Cruz, Chad Perry, Diana McBroom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Estavez
as 6:2022cv00288
Petitioner:
Reidie James Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Judge Ana Estavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
