Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Richard Nelson v. Veronica Galvan, et al
as 22-35653
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD DEWAYNE NELSON
Defendant / Appellee:
VERONICA ALICEA GALVAN, Judge, King County Superior Court, REBEKA NEYHART, DNA Forensic Scientist and JOHN R BATISTE, Chief, Washington State Patrol
Richard Nelson v. Emmanuelle Dinca, et al
as 22-35475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD DEWAYNE NELSON
Defendant / Appellee:
EMMANUELLE DINCA, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, WILLIAM DOYLE, Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, VERONICA GALVAN, Judge, King County Superior Court and others
Nelson v. White
as 3:2022cv05363
Petitioner:
Austin Richard Moores Nelson
Respondent:
Daniel White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Galvan et al
as 2:2022cv00547
Plaintiff:
Richard Dewayne Nelson
Defendant:
Veronica Galvan, Rebeka Neyhart, John Batiste and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Dinca et al
as 2:2021cv01457
Plaintiff:
Richard Dewayne Nelson
Defendant:
Emmanlelle Dinca, William Doyle, Veronica Galvan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Galvan et al
as 2:2021cv00195
Defendant:
Ramona C Brandes, Daniel T Satterberg, Veronica Alicea Galvan and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Dewayne Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. USA
as 1:2017cv00391
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Brooks Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pallitto v. Nelson et al
as 2:2011cv15543
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pallitto
Defendant:
Richard R Nelson and Isidore Torres
Richard Nelson v. W. Sullivan
as 09-15391
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD ALLEN NELSON
Respondent - Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN
Nelson v. Sullivan
as 1:2007cv00466
Petitioner:
Richard Allen Nelson
Respondent:
W.J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
