Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Chrustowski v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00555
Petitioner:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Respondent:
Robert Bishop and Phillip Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bishop v. Salcedo et al
as 1:2018cv00714
Plaintiff:
Robert Bishop
Defendant:
F. Salcedo, A. Perez, J. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AJABU v. HAMILTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, et al.
as 1:2017cv01218
Plaintiff:
KOFI M. AJABU
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, KEVIN SCIONTI ESTATE (Deceased), ERIC K. KOSELKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Bishop v. Raul Lopez, et al
as 16-17352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BISHOP
Defendant - Appellee:
RAUL LOPEZ, Warden, J. GERMOND, C. RODRIGUEZ and others
AJABU v. HAMILTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2016cv02613
Plaintiff:
KOFI MODIBO AJABU
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, ERIC K. KOSELKE, SONIA LEERKAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Robert Bishop
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson et al v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Gregory O'Neil Henderson, Pedro Pedroza, Steve Hoo and others
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Lopez et al
as 1:2015cv00272
Plaintiff:
Robert Bishop
Defendant:
Raul Lopez, J. Germond, C. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bishop v. Kelly Harrington, et al
as 14-15145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BISHOP
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, M. D. BITER, Warden, J. SOTO and others
Robert Parham v. Stu Sherman
as 13-57142
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT BISHOP PARHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
MIKE MCDONALD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
