Cases 1 - 10 of 4,862
Holman et al v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Rodney S Perry, Sr, Gregory A Jones, Darcell Andre McCants and others
Defendant:
Ron Neal and Debra Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flook v. Haynes
as 2:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Roger W Flook, Jr.
Respondent:
Ron Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Bradley Haag v. Jeff Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv05111
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Haag
Defendant:
Warden Jeff Macomber, Ron Broomfield, Joseph Poick and others
Respondent:
Brandon Strobelt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. DeSantis et al
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Cole
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, City of Jacksonville, Patrick Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith-Young v. Valencia et al
as 2:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Finesse Nikkol Smith-Young
Defendant:
Jennifer L Valencia, Ron Fujino, Z Fratto and others
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Haag v. Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv01625
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Haag
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Ron Broomfield, Joseph Poick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feldpausch v. Rabdia et al
as 3:2024cv03088
Plaintiff:
Ron Feldpausch
Defendant:
. Rabdia, Wexford Medical, . Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vibbert v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Colton T Vibbert and Colton Vibbert
Defendant:
John Galipeau, White, Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Haag v. Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv01624
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Haag
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Ron Broomfield, Joseph Poick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
