Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Anselmo v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 9:2019cv00350
Defendant:
Keysor, Gregory Cassidy, John McIntyre and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Anselmo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels, et al v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 3:2016cv00518
Plaintiff:
Roy O. Daniels, Edward Maynor, Miguel A. Ruiz and others
Defendant:
Richard Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodvine, Christopher v. Meisner, Michael et al
as 3:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
Christopher Goodvine
Defendant:
Michael Meisner , Michael Dittman , Sandra Hautamaki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2012cv01800
Petitioner:
Ronald Woods
Respondent:
John Kerestes and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hiram Brinson v. Larry Gordon, et al
as 12-56562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HIRAM BRINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS MILLER, individual and official capacity as Deputy Sheriff, CHRISTOPHER PORRAZZO, individual and official capacity as Corporal Deputy Sheriff, BENJAMIN SEAGRAVES, individual and official capacity as Deputy Sheriff and others
Ronald Woods, Jr. v. Andrew Taber
as 12-5491
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD WOODS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
ANDREW TABER, Director, SCCC
Woods v. Key et al
as 2:2012cv02090
Plaintiff:
Ronald Woods
Defendant:
Kevin Key, Janet Kelly and Shelby County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
as 2:2012cv02056
Petitioner:
Ronald Woods
Respondent:
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woods v. Coleman et al
as 2:2011cv02857
Plaintiff:
Ronald Woods, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronald Coleman, Mark Luttrell, Shelby County Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hiram Brinson v. Larry Gordon et al
as 5:2011cv00869
Plaintiff:
Hiram Brinson
Defendant:
Larry Gordon, Larry Gordon, Douglass Miller and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
