Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Rushing v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02577
Petitioner:
Theodore Roosevelt Rushing
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Escobar v. Irby et al
as 2:2023cv02082
Plaintiff:
Michael D Escobar
Defendant:
Irene Barron Irby, Unknown Rushing, Unknown Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Olson v. Pinal, County of et al
as 2:2023cv01064
Plaintiff:
Trinity Olson
Defendant:
Pinal, County of, J Alcantar, Unknown Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Packard v. Ashworth et al
as 2:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Jacob Packard
Defendant:
Kristoffer Ashworth, Q Rush, Darren Frei and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seneca #113423 v. Koeppel et al
as 2:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Kristofer Michael Seneca
Defendant:
Cynthia M Koeppel, Quinn Harvey, Alfred Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jumper v. United States of America et al
as 4:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel E Jumper
Defendant:
United States of America, Catricia Howard, Unknown Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miranda v. Casa Grande, City of et al
as 2:2019cv04618
Defendant:
Casa Grande, City of and Richard Rush
Plaintiff:
Adrian Miranda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Conroy v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv02458
Defendant:
B Schmid, Unknown Harris, Jessica Todd and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Conroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddards v. Maricopa County Jails et al
as 2:2017cv04123
Plaintiff:
Ryan Rush Eddards
Defendant:
Maricopa County Jails, Towers Jail and Lower Buckeye Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddards v. Wal-Mart et al
as 2:2017cv03982
Plaintiff:
Ryan Rush Eddards
Defendant:
Wal-Mart and Maricopa County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
