Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Keita v. Huckell et al
as 0:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Mamady Kalifa Keita
Defendant:
Scott Huckell, Matthew Russell, Jonanthan C. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Segal
as 0:2023cv01075
Petitioner:
Georgie Elaine Russell
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson-Baldwin v. USA
as 0:2022cv03115
Petitioner:
Russell James Anderson-Baldwin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hoff v. USA
as 0:2022cv02919
Petitioner:
Derrick Russell Hoff
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Walker v. Sherburne County et al
as 0:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Clifton Walker
Defendant:
Sherburne County, Sherburne County Jail, Brain Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf v. Fikes et al
as 0:2022cv00194
Petitioner:
Russell Eugene Wolf
Respondent:
J. Fikes and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mays v. Sherburne County et al
as 0:2021cv02382
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail, The, Sherburne County, Elk River City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Fikes
as 0:2020cv02339
Petitioner:
Russell Eugene Wolf
Respondent:
Warden J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Haman v. Beltrami County et al
as 0:2020cv02277
Defendant:
Beltrami County Sheriffs Office, Deputy Joseph Kleszyk, Deputy Charles Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph Haman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allan et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2020cv01980
Plaintiff:
Steven Hawkins, Patrick Otten, Maikijah Hakeem and others
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Jodi Harpstead, Marshall Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
