Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cook v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al.
as 1:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
William H. Cook, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Colette Peters, Warden David LeMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. Peters et al.
as 3:2023cv02210
Plaintiff:
William H Cook, III
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Gregory Patton, S. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. Peters et al.
as 3:2023cv02211
Plaintiff:
William H. Cook, III
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Warden David Lemaster, S. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rollins v. Lane et al
as 4:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
James B. Rollins
Defendant:
Warden Tim Lane, Department of C, Quetin Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Bell
as 2:2020cv02584
Petitioner:
Michael S. Gibson
Respondent:
Earl Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. City Of Zion Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv01040
Defendant:
Michael G. Nerheim and City Of Zion Police Department
Plaintiff:
Kyai S Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Meehan-Bennet et al
as 3:2019cv00388
Defendant:
Warden Gene Beasley, SIA S. Prutzman, Associate Warden S. Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Thor Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cohea v. Brown et al
as 3:2017cv05399
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., C. E. Ducart, Dave Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Gibson et al
as 1:2007cv01045
Petitioner:
Danny Williams
Respondent:
Richard S Gibson, John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Claice v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2007cv02160
Plaintiff:
John A. Claice
Defendant:
Joe Ortiz, Pryer, Luna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
