Cases 1 - 10 of 1,741
Harper v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02109
Petitioner:
Terek Harper
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bastas v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02105
Petitioner:
Andreas Peter Bastas
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennis v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02099
Petitioner:
Antwain Lamar Dennis
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCGILL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
MELISSA GRIFFIN MCGILL
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Macon v. Morton et al
as 5:2024ct03116
Plaintiff:
Cory Montae Macon
Defendant:
Warden Morton, Michael Russell, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02092
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TERRY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
DOYLE KENT TERRY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerome Butts v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6399
Petitioner:
JEROME JILAH BUTTS
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Ronald Sutherland, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6378
Petitioner:
RONALD KEITH SUTHERLAND, JR.
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and WARDEN
Anthony Hoover v. Stephen Waddell
as 24-6376
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDELL, Warden IV sued in individual and official capacity, ROY A. COOPER, III, Governor sued in individual and official capacity, ELIZABETH N. STRICKLAND, State Asst. District Attorney sued in individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
