Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Adams v. Murray et al
as 4:2023cv01471
Plaintiff: Stephen Earl Adams
Defendant: Billy J Murray, Greg Walker, Lonzo Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Kitchens et al
as 4:2023cv01430
Plaintiff: Stephen Earl Adams
Defendant: John Kitchens and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv01092
Petitioner: Stephen Earl Williams
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Coryell County Sheriff's Office
as 6:2021cv00995
Plaintiff: Stephen Earl Williams
Defendant: Coryell County Sheriff's Office, Attorney General D.A. Office, Sgt. FNU Vessor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2020cv00236
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Stephen Earl Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benzenhafer v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00055
Petitioner: Stephen Earl Benzenhafer
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scally v. Ferrara We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01711
Petitioner: Stephen Earl Scally
Respondent: Thomas A. Ferrara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sivo v. Benewah County Commissioners et al
as 2:2017cv00329
Petitioner: Stephen Earl-Linn Sivo
Respondent: Benewah County Commissioners, Benewah County Sheriff, Benewah County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID CASE TRANSFERRED TO LUFKIN DIVISION
as 6:2017cv00177
Petitioner: Stephen Earl Davis
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2017cv00043
Petitioner: Stephen Earl Davis
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?