Cases 1 - 10 of 17
LAUGHMAN v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv02154
Defendant:
JOHN DOES MEMBERS AND/OR EMPLOYEES OF THE HOWARD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, OFFICER KENNETH WINES, OFFICER ADAM MARTIN and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF GUSTIN MARTIN and COURTNEY LAUGHMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2020cv01338
Defendant:
Warden, Lorie Davis, Nathan Quarterman and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2020cv00666
Defendant:
Warden, Nathan Quarterman, Byrd Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Rogers et al
as 1:2019cv00191
Defendant:
Steve Rogers, FNU LNU, TDCJ-ID and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Alan Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv03722
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, LAURA BODKIN and PAUL A. TALBOT
Plaintiff:
STEVE ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. ASHER et al
as 1:2019cv01532
Plaintiff:
MARKISS YOUNG
Defendant:
STEVE ROGERS, CITY OF KOKOMO and JERRY ASHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDING v. HOWARD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2019cv01015
Defendant:
HOWARD COUNTY JAIL, N. GIBSON, MARTIN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. HARDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTATE OF TAVARIS McGUIRE v. BAKER et al
as 1:2019cv00876
Defendant:
GREG GOODNIGHT, ROBERT BAKER, HOWARD COUNTY INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF TAVARIS McGUIRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABNEY v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2019cv00271
Defendant:
ROBIN BUYERS, STEVE ROGERS, BILL MENGES and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH D. ABNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ROGER et al
as 1:2018cv00302
Defendant:
ROBIN BYERS, HOWARD CO. SHERIFF DEPT. and STEVE ROGER
Plaintiff:
EDD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
