Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Parker et al v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Felisha Parker and Laresha Parker
Defendant:
Lawton City of, James T Smith, Terry Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Scanlon et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
Amber Marie Burnett
Respondent:
Alan Scanlon and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scanlon v. State of Vermont
as 2:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Kip Scanlon
Respondent:
State of Vermont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robinson v. Henry et al
as 6:2023cv01755
Plaintiff:
Ramone Dayne Robinson
Defendant:
Duane Henry, Kadean Wilson, Trevor Persenaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett #799595 v. Brown et al
as 1:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Marcellous Santa Bennett #799595
Defendant:
Karyn Brown and Gayle Scanlon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Calhoun #379175 v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Samuel Eugene Calhoun #379175
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Sherry L. Burt, Darrell A. Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Washington et al
as 5:2023cv10946
Plaintiff:
Samuel Eugene Calhoun
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Sherry L. Burt, Darrell A. Steward and others
Williams v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Lawton City of, James Smith, Terry Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
