Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Lynch v. Robertson et al
as 1:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Tavars D. Lynch and Tavars Dewayne Lynch
Defendant:
Barry E. Robertson, Matthew Wade, Eric Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Key v. Clay et al
as 1:2021cv01625
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kevin Key
Defendant:
Heather Clay, Nicole Stewart, Eric Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starr v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00641
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Starr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge and others
Defendant:
Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Wade et al
as 1:2019cv01551
Defendant:
Matthew Wade, Chames, E Starr and others
Plaintiff:
Darian Levon Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moten v. Calhoun County Jail et al
as 1:2019cv00733
Defendant:
Calhoun County Jail, Sheriff Matthew Wade, Lt Chames and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D Moten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Calhoun County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv01699
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Morgan
Defendant:
Calhoun County Jail, Matthew Wade, Lt Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. Amerson et al
as 1:2016cv00330
Plaintiff:
Theron L Christian
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Eric Starr, Whiteside and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roebuck v. Amerson et al
as 1:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
James Jeffery Roebuck
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Lisa Abernathy and Ronald Starr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Amerson et al
as 1:2011cv01236
Plaintiff:
Gary Joe Johnson
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Eric Starr, Lisa Abernathey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
