Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Counts v. Wasko et al
as 4:2023cv04103
Defendant:
GTL Technology, Kellie Wasko, Brent Fluke and others
Plaintiff:
David L Counts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Searcy v. Paxton et al
as 3:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Ralph Willis, Joseph McDevett, Amber Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Darring et al
as 3:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Jaime Rawlinson, Tammy Cisernos, Galveston County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. State Bar of Texas Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Defendant:
Warren Paxton, Tammy Cisernos, Ralph Willis and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Office of Attorney General - Child Support Division et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Interactive Services, Ralph Willis, Casa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. County Of Galveston et al
as 3:2019cv00323
Defendant:
Sgt. Popavich, Judge Stephen Baker, County Of Galveston and others
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contrell Plummer v. Robert Dilday, et al
as 16-1848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONTRELL PLUMMER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT M. DILDAY, South Upper Lieutenant, individually and in official capacity, ROY L. GRATHLER, DANA JAENKE, South Upper 8 Gallery Officer, individually and in official capacity and others
Sherrell Towns v. Lieutenant Holton, et al
as 08-3030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERRELL C. TOWNS
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT HOLTON, STEPHEN BAKER, M. EUBANKS, Correctional Officer and others
Bradley v. Doughthat et al
as 9:2007cv00784
Plaintiff:
James J. Bradley
Defendant:
Matthew Doughthat, John Mitchell and Stephen Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
