Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Chafin v. Caudill et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chafin
Defendant:
Steve Caudill, Superintendent Jason Hutson, Joseph Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rutter v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Damien Rutter
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mackey v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mackey
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Director of Security Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richison v. Chapman et al
as 2:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Richison
Defendant:
CO Aaron Chapman, CO Joel Hammer, CO Ashley Husk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McClendon v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Calvin McClendon
Defendant:
Lieutenant Timothy Tibbs, Superintendent Jason Hutson, Steve Caudill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Jacob Shields
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeemer v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
Richard McNeemer
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs and Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copen SR v. Daniels et al
as 5:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Copen SR
Defendant:
Pam Daniels, Erin Lynn, Misty Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. City of Beckley et al
as 5:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Steve Ray Cooper
Defendant:
The City of Beckley, William Reynolds and Andrew Milam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. Ames
as 5:2019cv00801
Petitioner:
Marvin Steve Mills
Respondent:
Donnie Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
