Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Alrelio Evans v. Adam Houghton, et al
as 23-1566
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALRELIO EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM HOUGHTON, Prison Counselor, in his individual capacity, DIANE SUPPES, Mailroom Staff, in her individual capacity, C. WATERMAN, Mailroom Staff, in his/her individual capacity and others
Evans #367619 v. Houghton et al
as 1:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Alrelio Evans #367619
Defendant:
Adam Houghton, Diane Suppes, C. Waterman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Suppes v. Stafford, County of
as 5:2022cv03224
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Suppes
Respondent:
Stafford, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Suppes v. Stafford, County of
as 5:2022cv03223
Plaintiff:
Adam Eugene Suppes
Defendant:
Stafford, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Suppes v. Williams
as 1:2022cv01772
Petitioner:
Michael John Suppes
Respondent:
JW Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Boatman v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2020cv00339
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, John Coner, Wellpath and others
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tomaske v. City of Montrose, Colorado et al
as 1:2020cv01238
Defendant:
City of Montrose, Colorado, Montrose City Police Department, J. Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Tomaske
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Quinlan et al
as 1:2020cv01051
Defendant:
Justin Tolentino, Long, Brendan R. Markham and others
Plaintiff:
Terance D. Wilson
Interested Party:
TO THE CASE MANAGER/INMATE COORDINATOR OF: Terance D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rial v. Trueba et al
as 5:2019cv00413
Defendant:
J Johnson, FNU Banks, FNU Lugo and others
Plaintiff:
Christina Rial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rial v. Trueba et al
as 5:2019cv00346
Defendant:
Laundry Department, Mail Room, FNU Banks and others
Plaintiff:
Christina Rial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
