Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Manley v. Everhart et al
as 3:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Michael Manley
Defendant:
Nathan Everhart, Cody Swift and Shelbyville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simon v. Shelbyville Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00589
Plaintiff:
Mykhah Calvin Simon
Defendant:
Shelbyville Police Department, Nathan Everhart, Cody Swift and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silva v. Mullen et al
as 3:2020cv00938
Defendant:
Scott Swift and Andrew Mullen
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Swift et al
as 3:2020cv00810
Defendant:
Harding Trust Group, Jay Schaudies, Austin Swift and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shirley et al v. Corizon Corp. et al
as 3:2020cv00213
Defendant:
f/n/u Swift, Tony Parker, Corizon Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Meriweather and Thomas Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joyce v. Fields et al
as 2:2018cv02628
Defendant:
Mr. Askew, Nurse Moor, Mrs. Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Columbus M. Joyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Handspike v. Tennessee Department of Correction et.al.
as 1:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Dion Handspike
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Attorney General, Tennessee Department of Correction, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Webb et al
as 2:2016cv02055
Plaintiff:
Donyel Thomas
Defendant:
Webb, Swift, P. Echols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Webb et al
as 2:2015cv02537
Plaintiff:
Stephan Richardson
Defendant:
Webb, Swift, Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swift v. Anderson et al
as 2:2015cv00001
Defendant:
Wayne Anderson, Lt. Mowdy, Sgt. Hatfield and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Nick Swift, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
