Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Christopher Johnson v. County of Greenville, et al
as 18-16532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF GREENVILLE, employer of Christopher T. Posey, CHRISTOPHER T. POSEY, attorney, individual and official capacity, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, employer of Karen Ratigan and others
Johnson v. Greenville, County of et al
as 2:2018cv02032
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Greenville, County of, Christopher T Posey, South Carolina, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Posey
as 6:2016cv02453
Plaintiff:
Derrick Antron Young
Defendant:
Christopher T Posey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Posey et al
as 2:2010cv03180
Plaintiff:
Harold Anderson
Defendant:
Christopher T Posey, Randy Mr Chambers, Michael R Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Posey et al
as 2:2010cv02982
Plaintiff:
Harold Anderson
Defendant:
Christopher T Posey, Steve W Sumner, Susuan W Hugins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Posey et al
as 8:2010cv02982
Plaintiff:
Harold Anderson
Defendant:
Christopher T Posey, Steve W Sumner, Susuan W Hugins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mailliard King v. T. Carey, et al
as 10-15720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAILLIARD LUCIEN KING
Defendant - Appellee:
T. L. CAREY, D. K. SISTO, C. D. BROWN and others
Miquel Diaz v. T.L. Carey, et al
as 09-15346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL E. DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
T.L. CAREY, D. K. SISTO, C.D. BROWN and others
Blamey v. Sisto, et al.,
as 2:2007cv00867
Defendant:
T. L. Carey, D.K. Sisto, C. D. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dennis Blamey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salazar v. Carey et al
as 2:2007cv00848
Plaintiff:
Luis Vargas Salazar
Defendant:
T. L. Carey, D. K. Sisto, C. D. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
