Cases 1 - 9 of 9
GHOLSTON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GHOLSTON
Defendant:
JASON CARTER, JAEKAR TEAH and CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LIMA v. CARTER et al
as 1:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN LIMA
Defendant:
CARTER, TEAH and RUNYON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CENTURION HEALTH, et al
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
ROJAE BROWN
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, TEAH, JOHN CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWANN v. IND DEPT. OF CORR et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
IND DEPT. OF CORR, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JAMES BASINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wimberly v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2021cv62179
Plaintiff:
Teah Wimberly
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wimberly v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00456
Petitioner:
Teah Wimberly
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Teah v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2008cv01500
Petitioner:
Neibo Teah
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, David Venturella and others
Miscellaneou:
Craig Robinson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SCHWEITZER v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2008cv01806
Plaintiff:
LEO F. SCHWEITZER, III
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Schweitzer v. The United States et al
as 3:2007cv01895
Plaintiff:
Leo F. Schweitzer, III
Defendant:
The United States, United States Of America, Attorney General of United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
