Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 363
Fluker v. Horton et al
as 4:2024cv00723
Plaintiff: Terry A Fluker
Defendant: Jonathan W Horton and Etowah County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Marshall et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff: Alan Eugene Miller
Defendant: Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff: Jamie Mills
Defendant: John Hamm, Terry Raybon, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff: Courtney M. Smith
Defendant: David Jones, David Martinez, Leroy D. Dale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff: Kenneth Eugene Smith
Defendant: John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Raybon
as 2:2023cv01433
Petitioner: Bart Wayne Johnson
Respondent: Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wimbley v. Raybon
as 1:2023cv00440
Cherch v. Terry et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00635
Plaintiff: Kenneth Cherch
Defendant: Nurse Terry, Dr. Gurley and Quality Correctional Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Gordy et al
as 7:2023cv01428
Plaintiff: Terry Perkins
Defendant: Christopher Gordy and John Hutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Raybon
as 2:2023cv01332
Petitioner: Brandon Deon Mitchell
Respondent: Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?