Cases 1 - 10 of 1,735
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 5:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Steven Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Huggins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Cedric Anthony Reese
Defendant:
Thomas Huggins and Blake Turman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bynum (INMATE 2)
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Williams
Defendant:
Mason Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Caldwell v. Hamm et al
as 6:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Curtis Caldwell
Defendant:
John Hamm, Dr. Thomas, Scotty Schaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Carter
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and The State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Holtzclaw et al
as 7:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alvis Young
Defendant:
Malcolm G Holtzclaw, Michael G Underwood and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Elmore Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Chris Dwayne Williams
Defendant:
Elmore Correctional Facility, Lt. Carter, Ms. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. State of Alabama
as 1:2023cv00448
Petitioner:
Thomas Norton
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lake v. SK Office of Bessemer, AL et al
as 2:2023cv01560
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mark Lake
Defendant:
SK Office of Bessemer, AL, Mercedes Benz Corp, Ella and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
