Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Aguirre et al v. Correct Care Solutions, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2019cv00446
Plaintiff:
Dominic Michael Bonavia, Joe Carl Anthony Bonavia, Mika Rae Thurman and others
Defendant:
Shoniree Yvonne DeBusk, Miranda Van Stratten, Jackson County, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wade v. USA
as 1:2016cv00032
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Thurman L Wade, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thurman v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv02021
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Thurman
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Scotty Clark, Unknown Engler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurman v. Wallace
as 4:2014cv01958
Petitioner:
Jeffrey G. Thurman
Respondent:
Ian Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ingrassia v. Schafer et al
as 4:2014cv00470
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Ingrassia
Defendant:
Keith Schafer, Mark Stringer, Felix Vincenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingrassia v. Schafer et al
as 4:2011cv02062
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Ingrassia
Defendant:
Keith Schafer, Felix Vincenz, Julie Inman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. St. Louis County Jail et al
as 4:2011cv00165
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Harris
Defendant:
St. Louis County Jail, State of Missouri, Christopher West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurman v. Norman
as 4:2011cv00013
Petitioner:
Jeffery Thurman
Respondent:
Jeff Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne v. Schlink et al
as 6:2008cv03057
Petitioner:
Thurman Dee Payne
Respondent:
David Schlink, Marty C. Anderson and Marty C. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Payne v. Anderson
as 6:2008cv03002
Petitioner:
Thurman Dee Payne
Respondent:
Marty C. Anderson, Marty C. Anderson and Scott Klinzing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
