Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Tonnie Nealy v. Department of Children and Family Services
as 24-11867
Petitioner:
TONNIE NEALY
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
Hall et al v. Carner et al
as 2:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Wendall Hall and Tonnie Nealy
Defendant:
Jon Carner, Mr. Houston, Ms. Serina Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDEN et al v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HARDEN, MARVIN STRONG, TONNY COCKRAIL and others
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BILL JOY, TGGS CANTINE SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quordalis Sanders v. William Griesbach, et al
as 24-1359
Plaintiff:
QUORDALIS V. SANDERS
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, VICTORIA VAN-BURNS, P.A. KROOL and others
McGuinn v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2024cv01405
Plaintiff:
Leo Braden McGuinn
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas J Dart, Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tonnie Nealy v. Donald Sawyer, et al
as 24-10182
Plaintiff:
TONNIE NEALY
Defendant:
DONALD SAWYER and EMILY SALEMA
Sanders v. Hepp et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Quordalis V Sanders
Defendant:
Randall Hepp, Yana Posich, Tonnie Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Griesbach et al
as 2:2023cv01627
Plaintiff:
Quordalis V Sanders
Defendant:
Judge William Griesbach, Victoria Van-Burns, PA Krool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall et al v. Carner et al
as 2:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Wendall Hall and Tonnie Nealy
Defendant:
Jon Carner and Smart Communication LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealy v. Secretary of D.C.F.
as 6:2023cv01255
Petitioner:
Tonnie Nealy
Respondent:
Secretary of D.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
