Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Cunningham v. Helms, et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Natasha L. Cunningham and Natasha Lashay Cunningham
Defendant:
District Court of Geneva County, Alabama and Tony Helms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Helms et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Defendant:
Tony Helms, Mike McCorment, James Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burkhart v. Vinson et al
as 2:2022cv04161
Plaintiff:
Dustin Burkhart
Defendant:
Brian Vinson, Camden County, Missouri, Tony Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Brown et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Wayne Vanathan Black
Defendant:
Ken Brown, Adero J. Marshall, Derek Portwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burkhart v. Vinson et al
as 2:2020cv04086
Defendant:
McGuire, Martin, Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Scott Burkhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Brunson et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2020cv00310
Defendant:
Tony Helms, Geneva County Jail, Macon County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burkhart v. Helms et al
as 2:2020cv04077
Plaintiff:
Dustin Scott Burkhart
Defendant:
Tony Helms, Jason Van Donsel, Monnig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burkhart v. Vinson et al
as 2:2020cv04070
Defendant:
McGuire, Martin, Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Scott Burkhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burkhart v. Helms et al
as 2:2020cv04058
Plaintiff:
Dustin Scott Burkhart
Defendant:
Mitchell, Morrisson, Tony Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
