Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Smocks v. USA
as 23-10746
Petitioner / Appellant:
Troy Anthony Smocks
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
SMOCKS v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2022cv03681
Plaintiff:
TROY ANTHONY SMOCKS
Defendant:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smocks v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv02662
Petitioner:
Troy Anthony Smocks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03534
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00838
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smocks v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
as 4:2022cv00592
Plaintiff:
Mr Troy Anthony Smocks
Defendant:
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
SMOCKS v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv00361
Plaintiff:
TROY A. SMOCKS
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BARACK OBAMA, THE UNITED STATES SENATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy Smocks v. Missouri Cole County, et al
as 10-1391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Troy A. Smocks
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Cole County, Richard Callahan, Judge, Patricia Joyce, Judge and others
Troy Smocks v. Missouri Attorney General, et al
as 10-1199
Petitioner - Appellant:
Troy A. Smocks
Respondent - Appellee:
Missouri Attorney General and Dave Dormire
Smocks v. Cole County et al
as 2:2009cv04153
Plaintiff:
Troy A Smocks
Defendant:
Missouri Cole County, Richard Callahan, Patricia Joyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
