Cases 1 - 10 of 19
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 2:2021cv00399
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ARTHUR ALLEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and UNITED STATES MARSHAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PIATT v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL
as 1:2020cv02200
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL
Plaintiff:
SEAN F. PIATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREWS v. LUBBEHUSEN et al
as 2:2020cv00340
Plaintiff:
NORRIS DESHON ANDREWS
Defendant:
B. LAMMER, T.J. WATSON, UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH et al v. SAINT PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00598
Defendant:
BOB STELLER, MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INC., EDDIE CURRAN and others
Plaintiff:
EDMOND HUDMOND SMITH, IV and LOUIS HOLGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DADDONO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2018cv00403
Defendant:
MOHAN, NOWAKOWSKI, NDIFE and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DADDONO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 1:2017cv02590
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ROBERT CESSAR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 3:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ROBERT CESSAR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 4:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ROBERT CESSAR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SWALLERS v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL
as 1:2016cv01993
Petitioner:
BRENT SWALLERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Restricted Filer v. Roberts et al
as 1:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Richard W Roberts, Henry H Kennedy, Rosemary M Collyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
