Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Marshall #303868 v. Brickman et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Ralph A. Marshall #303868
Defendant:
Unknown Brickman, Unknown Riley, Unknown Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick Stampone v. Michigan Supreme Court, et al
as 24-1252
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK STAMPONE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT, Official and or personal capacity, JULIE CLEMENT, Clerk, official and or personal capacity, MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS, Official and personal capacity and others
Gresham #272603 v. Awomolo et al
as 1:2024cv00242
Defendant:
A. Awomolo, Double A, Unknown Shembarger and others
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Michael Gresham #272603
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stampone #713769 v. Michigan Supreme Court et al
as 1:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stampone #713769
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Julie Clement, Michigan Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casel v. Lyon et al
as 2:2023cv01986
Plaintiff:
Cecil Charles Casel, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Lyon, Unknown Valaquez, Unknown Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Pratt et al
as 2:2018cv02572
Defendant:
Sumi Erno, Richard Pratt, Corizon Health LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Marquise Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Clark v. N. Johnston, et al
as 17-3812
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
N. JOHNSTON, L. DANIEL JOHNSON, ART JAMES and others
David Clark v. N. Johnston, et al
as 13-3581
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
N. JOHNSTON, L. DANIEL JOHNSON, ART JAMES and others
Burnett #200640 v. McQuiggin et al
as 2:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Burnett #200640
Defendant:
Greg McQuiggin, Patricia Caruso, Unknown Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
