Cases 1 - 10 of 3,068
Sheets v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II et al
as 5:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
Daniel Sheets
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II and California Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morgan v. Warden, USP Thomson
as 3:2024cv50382
Petitioner:
Jack William Morgan
Respondent:
Warden, USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Luczak, Ronald v. USP Coleman
as 1:2024cv23600
Defendant:
USP Coleman
Plaintiff:
Ronald Luczak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jeter v. Warden, USP Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00139
Respondent:
Warden, USP Hazelton
Petitioner:
Jeffery Jeter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jacksonbey v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2024cv00505
Petitioner:
Haneef Shakeel Jacksonbey
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2024cv00485
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Petitioner:
Denny Ray Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gomez v. Yazoo City USP
as 3:2024cv00430
Respondent:
Yazoo City USP
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Alberto Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jacques, Patrick v. Lee USP
as 1:2024cv23496
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Lee USP
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Mohamed v. Warden, USPO Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00138
Respondent:
Warden, USP Hazelton
Petitioner:
Guled Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Darrell Parks v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 24-12227
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Petitioner:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
