Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Virginia Goforth v. Harley Lappin
as 15-7360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIRGINIA ARLENE GOFORTH
Plaintiff:
MR. GOFORTH, Virginia Arlene Goforth's Husband, and et al
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director of Bureau of Prisons, NEWTON KENDING, Bureau of Prisons Medical Director, AMBER NELSON, Warden, Alderson Federal Prison Camp and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION, Individually, and in their official capacity as Custodians/Directors of Custodians, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General or Predecessor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-12115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Virginia Goforth v. Harley Lappin
as 11-6510
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIRGINIA ARLENE GOFORTH and MR. GOFORTH, Virginia Arlene Goforth's Husband, and et al
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director of Bureau of Prisons, NEWTON KENDING, Bureau of Prisons Medical Director, AMBER NELSON, Warden, Alderson Federal Prison Camp and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (and specifically herein), FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General or Predecessor and others
Goforth, et al. v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2009cv00003
Plaintiff:
Virginia Arlene Goforth and Virginia Arlene Goforth's Husband
Defendant:
United States of America, The Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael B. Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Goforth v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv00550
Plaintiff:
Virginia Arlene Goforth
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
