Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Kimery v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00652
Defendant:
Aundrea Culclager, Doe, Marshal Dale Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Fielding Vaughn Kimery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. The State of Arkansas / ADC
as 4:2024cv04030
Petitioner:
Walter Earnest Vaughn, III
Respondent:
The State of Arkansas / ADC and The State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kimery v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Fielding Vaughn Kimery
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Buchanon
as 4:2024cv04017
Plaintiff:
Walter Earnest Vaughn
Defendant:
Mickey Buchanon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lambert v. Philhours et al
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dorletha Lasha Lambert
Defendant:
Randy F Philhours, Charlene Davidson Henry, David Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimery v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00803
Plaintiff:
Fielding Vaughn Kimery
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James G Gibson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spears v. Osceola Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
James Spears, Jr
Defendant:
Osceola Police Department, Jennifer Ephlin, Chris Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Wright et al
as 4:2021cv00567
Defendant:
Winston, O'Neal, Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Wright et al
as 4:2021cv00553
Defendant:
Winston, O'Neal, Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimery v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00209
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Roy Griffin, Marshal Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Fielding Vaughn Kimery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
