Cases 1 - 10 of 580
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rives v. Hamm et al
as 4:2023cv01659
Petitioner:
Walter Richard Rives
Respondent:
John Q. Hamm, Phillip Mitchell and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Sanders et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Elijah Deshawn Robinson
Defendant:
Demarcus Sanders, A. Murphy, Jamal D. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Posey (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Leavert Kendrel McKinney
Defendant:
Lt. Posey and Walter Posey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bowns et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
Nathan Lamar Jones
Respondent:
N Bowns, W Davis, Pressly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Carter et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
James Brooks Walter and Walter James Brooks
Defendant:
Karen Carter and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2022cv00662
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Eugene Thomas
Defendant:
Jake Jackson, Donald Carter and Walter Lee Gray, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
