Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Robinson v. Tuck et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00850
Defendant:
Officer Henderson, Elmore County Jail, Captain Tuck and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Floyd Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00881
Defendant:
Nurse Deramus, Officer Prayter, Bill Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Floyd Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis Wiley v. Rescar Companies, Incorporated
as 15-20502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS FLOYD WILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
RESCAR COMPANIES, INCORPORATED
FLOYD v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2015cv00361
Petitioner:
WILLIE FLOYD
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willis Wiley v. Texas Parole Board Members, et al
as 15-20152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS FLOYD WILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS PAROLE BOARD MEMBERS, BOARD MEMBER RISSIE OWENS, JUANITA M. GONZALEZ and others
Willis Wiley v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-20145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS FLOYD WILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Wiley v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
Willis Floyd Wiley
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis Wiley v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-20356
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIS FLOYD WILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Willis Wiley v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-20108
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIS FLOYD WILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Willis Wiley v. Rescar Industries, Inc.
as 13-20645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS FLOYD WILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
RESCAR COMPANIES, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
