Cases 1 - 10 of 260
Talley v. McGorisk et al
as 1:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
Timothy McGorisk, Barbara Young, Kirbylee Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chen v. Miller
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Wu Long Chen
Defendant:
M. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(HC) Chen v. Warden, USP Atwater
as 1:2024cv00153
Petitioner:
Jia Wu Chen
Respondent:
Warden, USP Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Frei v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision et al
as 6:2023cv01572
Plaintiff:
Scott Frei and Richard W. Salmon
Defendant:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, Michael Wu, Christine Herman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enabnit v. Wu et al
as 4:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
John Eugene Enabnit
Defendant:
Johnny Wu and Andrea Valle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05752
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brown v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv05924
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lamar Brown
Defendant:
The City of New York, Warden Ronald Miller, Captain Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Floyd Eugene Bender v. J. Wu et al
as 2:2023cv04413
Plaintiff:
Floyd Eugene Bender, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Deputy J. Wu, Alex Villanueva and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
