Cases 1 - 10 of 4,960
Rose (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv02636
Petitioner:
Travis J. Rose
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bryant v. Travis County
as 1:2024cv01106
Defendant:
Travis County
Plaintiff:
Steven Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pink v. Harpe et al
as 5:2024cv00969
Defendant:
Nona Battles, R Gulbert, Tommy Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny L Hardeman and Lo Re Pink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Daytona Beach Life Guard Dept. et al
as 6:2024cv01696
Defendant:
Daytona Beach Life Guard Dept., The Florida Bar Association, Daytona Beach Police Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Hill
as 6:2024cv06098
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allen West
Defendant:
Travis Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. USA
as 5:2024cv00220
Petitioner:
Andrew Travis Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Simpson v. Armstrong et al
as 5:2024cv00209
Defendant:
Eric Guy, Krystal Sherrill, Coley Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maltlyio v. Travis County, State of Texas
as 1:2024cv01118
Defendant:
Travis County, State of Texas
Plaintiff:
Jamie Maltlyio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Northcutt v. Sacramento Sheriff's Dept., et al
as 2:2024cv02503
Plaintiff:
Travis Shane Northcutt
Defendant:
Harper Medical Group, DSH Napa and Sacramento Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Chapa et al
as 4:2024cv04076
Plaintiff:
Travis Cain Lewis
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Shereasa Chapa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
