Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Wright v. Smith et al
as 6:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
William Andre Wright
Defendant:
L. Smith, Vargas and Oviedo Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Wright, Jr. v. Allen, et al
as 24-1560
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HAROLD WRIGHT, JR.
Defendant:
CMC ALLEN, COUNSELOR EZZOLO and CASE MANAGER GABRIEL
William Wright, Jr. v. USA
as 23-12157
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM HAROLD WRIGHT, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wright v. Jamison
as 23-674
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Harold Wright, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Jamal L. Jamison
Wright v. Jamison
as 8:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
William Harold Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Jamal L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wright v. Jamison
as 1:2023cv01570
Petitioner:
William Harold Wright, Jr.
Respondent:
Jamal L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
William Wright v. Airway Heights Correction Center MSU, et al
as 22-36057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM J WRIGHT, a single person
Defendant / Appellee:
AIRWAY HEIGHTS CORRECTION CENTER MSU, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DON MCINTYRE, health services manager 2 and others
WRIGHT v. ALLISEN
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HAROLD WRIGHT
Defendant:
CMC ALLISEN, CMC ALLEN, COUNSELOR EZZOLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. HUTCHISON et al
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HAROLD WRIGHT, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN HUTCHISON, UDC TEAM OFFICER D. GABRIEL, UDC TEAM OFFICER S. EZZOLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. United States of America
as 8:2021cv02691
Plaintiff:
William Harold Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
