Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Tyrone Bell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
TYRONE ANTHONY BELL
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, RICHARD RUSSELL, Legal Administrator, GARY MINIARD, Warden and others
Tyrone Bell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 23-1598
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE ANTHONY BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, RICHARD RUSSELL, Legal Administrator, GARY MINIARD, Warden and others
William Peyatt v. David Gray
as 23-3159
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM DANIEL PEYATT
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID W. GRAY, Warden
DANIELS v. MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL (FDC)
as 3:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
WILLIAMS DANIELS
Defendant:
MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL (FDC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL (FDC)
as 2:2022cv03521
Plaintiff:
WILLIAMS DANIELS
Defendant:
MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL (FDC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemons v. Singleton et al
as 6:2021cv01882
Plaintiff:
William Daniel Clemons
Defendant:
Chief Singleton, Medical Director, Brevard County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Carter et al
as 1:2021cv08985
Plaintiff:
William Daniels
Defendant:
Warden Carter, Captain Guerra, Capt. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peyatt v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2021cv05141
Petitioner:
William Daniel Peyatt
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Carter et al
as 1:2021cv08629
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Lee, Daeshawn McCray, Kevin Terry and others
Defendant:
Warden Carter, Captain Guerra, Capt. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breeden v. Blackwell
as 2:2021cv00120
Plaintiff:
William Daniel Breeden
Defendant:
Dr. Chris Blackwell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
