Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Tatum v. Torrealba et al
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tatum
Defendant:
Judge Shelly Torrealba, Joseph Valeriani and Christine J. Yi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Chang v. US Department of Homeland Security, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 1:2023cv00166
Petitioner:
Yun Yi Chang
Respondent:
US Department of Homeland Security, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv01193
Plaintiff:
Juan L. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Tom Dart, P.A. Kaczrowski, R.N. Iman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angelo Lee v. Yujih Yi et al
as 2:2022cv03898
Plaintiff:
Angelo Lee
Defendant:
Yujih Yi, Sgt Hailey, Sgt Steinert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Yi v. Attorney General et al
as 2:2021cv00573
Petitioner:
Li Peng Yi
Respondent:
U.S. ICE Field Office Director for The Field Office and Warden of Immigration Detention Facility, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chang v. Friend
as 5:2021cv00099
Respondent:
Martin Friend
Petitioner:
Yun Yi Chang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
