Cases 1 - 6 of 6
United States of America v. $530,838.57 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TOTAL BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNT ENDING IN 1033, HELD IN THE NAME OF ALLURE TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$530,838.57 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TOTAL BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNT ENDING IN 1033, HELD IN THE NAME OF ALLURE TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC.
Claimant:
Nina Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. All Funds in the Approximate Amount of $13,500.00 Held in Bank of America Account #XXXXXX9577 et al
as 2:2013cv00176
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
All Funds in the Approximate Amount of $13,500.00 Held in Bank of America Account #XXXXXX9577, All Funds in the Approximate Amount of $3,594.45 Held in Bank of America Account #XXXXXX9580 and 2013 Toyota Corolla
Claimant:
Nina Mae Becker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Certain Real Property commonly known as 12223 85th St Pleasant Prairie WI
as 2:2011cv00339
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Certain Real Property commonly known as 12223 85th St Pleasant Prairie WI
Claimant:
Nina Goracio
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Solis v. Promesa System, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv06526
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Promesa System, Inc., East Harlem Council for Community Improvement, inc., Vivian Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Colon Soto et al v. United States Of America
as 1:2010cv06329
Plaintiff:
Francisco Colon Soto and Cinthia Luna Nina
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. Real Property and Premises Located at 168 Nina Street, St. Paul, Minnesota
as 0:2010cv02007
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property and Premises Located at 168 Nina Street, St. Paul, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
