Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Pierre v. Cintas Corporation No 2
as 2:2018cv00975
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No 2
Plaintiff:
Yvenson Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Garcia v. CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
as 5:2017cv00896
Defendant:
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cassingham v. Cintas Corporate Services Inc.,
as 5:2017cv05014
Plaintiff:
Mark Cassingham
Defendant:
Cintas Corporate Services, Inc. and Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ato Williams v. Cintas Services Corporate Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01623
Plaintiff:
Ato Williams
Defendant:
Cintas Services Corporate Services, Inc., Cintas Corporation No.2, Cintas Corporation No.3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jernagin v. Cintas Corporation
as 1:2017cv02273
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Jernagin and Ocia Wicks
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Shea v. Cintas Corporation
as 1:2016cv00794
Plaintiff:
Ruth Shea
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Burskey v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
Joni Burskey
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cypress v. Cintas Corporation No. 2
as 2:2016cv02478
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No 2
Plaintiff:
Steven Cypress
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Steinocher v. Cintas Corporation No. 2
as 2:2015cv00431
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Plaintiff:
Larry J Steinocher
Counter_claimant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Counter_defendant:
Larry J Steinocher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Miscellaneous Security Trust Fund v. Cintas Corporation
as 2:2015cv05141
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Miscellaneous Security Trust Fund
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
