Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Morgan v. Potter
as 2:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Angie Morgan
Defendant:
John E. Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Valentin-Velez et al v. Potter et al
as 3:2010cv01358
Plaintiff:
Sandy Valentin-Velez and Maribel Lopez
Defendant:
John E. Potter, US Postal Service, Luis Cabrera and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Bivens v. Potter et al
as 1:2010cv01344
Plaintiff:
Natalia M. Bivens
Defendant:
John E. Potter, American Postal Workers and Northwest Illinois Area Local
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
VILLANVEVA v. POTTER
as 2:2010cv00806
Plaintiff:
CARLOS M. VILLANVEVA
Defendant:
JOHN E. POTTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Travis v. Potter
as 5:2010cv00113
Plaintiff:
Rickey Travis
Defendant:
John E Potter
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Berthelot v. American Postal Workers Union, Local 185 et al
as 4:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Daniel J Berthelot
Defendant:
American Postal Workers Union, Local 185 and John E Potter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
QUIJIJE v. POTTER et al
as 2:2009cv06454
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS S. QUIJIJE
Defendant:
JOHN E. POTTER and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Vega v. Potter
as 3:2009cv02063
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Vega
Defendant:
John E. Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
nieves et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2009cv01710
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and John E. Potter
Plaintiff:
Grisselle nieves, marlyn berbena and karina marchany
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184 Violation Collection Bargain Agreement
Otero et al v. Potter et al
as 3:2009cv01592
Plaintiff:
Jose Otero, Victor Ocasio and Domingo Almodovar
Defendant:
John E. Potter and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
