Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Barta v. Georgia-Pacific LLC Lifechoices Benefits Program for Salaried and Salaried-Benefits Eligible Employees
as 1:2009cv00830
Plaintiff:
David Barta
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC Lifechoices Benefits Program for Salaried and Salaried-Benefits Eligible Employees
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Logan et al v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC et al
as 6:2009cv06232
Plaintiff:
Kermit Logan and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific, LLC and Georgia-Pacific Retiree Medical Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Kirk v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC
as 1:2009cv00404
Plaintiff:
Kevin B Kirk
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Georgia Pacific LLC
as 1:2009cv01445
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Puller v. Unisource Worldwide, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00813
Plaintiff:
Cary O. Puller, III
Defendant:
Unisource Worldwide, Inc., Georgia-Pacific LLC and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Homi v. Georgia Pacific, LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00754
Plaintiff:
Todd C. Homi and Todd C. Homi
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific, LLC, Georgia Pacific, LLC and Richard Paul Lammers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Cress v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC et al
as 6:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
Raymond R. Cress
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific, LLC and Georgia-Pacific, LLC, Salaried Pension Plan, #20000
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
