Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Pauta v. AJC Jewelry Contracting Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv06001
Plaintiff:
Esteban Pauta
Defendant:
Dion L. Smith, AJC Jewelry Contracting Corp. and Leo Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Acevedo v. Lola's Fine Jewelry, Inc.
as 0:2018cv60661
Plaintiff:
Paulino Acevedo
Defendant:
Lola's Fine Jewelry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Huyck v. Schilling-Devaney et al
as 3:2018cv00400
Plaintiff:
Karen Huyck
Defendant:
Sherrie Schilling-Devaney and Sherrie's Jewelry Box Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acosta v. Jewelry Television (PLR1)
as 3:2017cv00545
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Jewelry Television
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Lewis v. Dream Weavers Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00495
Defendant:
Dream Weavers Inc, Becky Whealer and Dream Weavers Inc doing business as Cecil's Fine Jewelry
Plaintiff:
Rachel Lewis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sanchez v. Jahan Jewelry, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02946
Plaintiff:
Rafael Sanchez
Defendant:
Jahan Jewelry, Inc. and Jahan Lahiji
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodriguez v. MIAMI JEWELRY EXCHANGE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2016cv21118
Plaintiff:
Victor Rodriguez
Defendant:
MIAMI JEWELRY EXCHANGE CORPORATION , Mani Aminov and Abram Aminov
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Unknown Plaintiff v. Daniel B NY, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00052
Defendant:
Daniel B NY, Inc. , Core Jewelry, Inc. , Kyung Hak Baik and others
Plaintiff:
Unknown Plaintiff
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Jo v. Daniel B NY, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Hyewon Julia Jo
Defendant:
Daniel B NY, Inc. , Core Jewelry, Inc. , Kyung Hak Baik and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
De Paz v. King David Jewelry, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07193
Defendant:
Mordechai David and King David Jewelry, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sandra De Paz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
