Cases 21 - 30 of 213
Porter v. Bedrock PC 1099, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Chad Porter
Defendant:
Bedrock PC 1099, LLC and EOG Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Li v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 4:2021cv01006
Plaintiff:
Fangfang Li
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America, THE CVS HEALTH WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN and EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER OF CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Vajdos v. Custer III et al
as 5:2021cv01265
Plaintiff:
John Vajdos
Defendant:
Len Elwood Custer III and Custer Resources and Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DeLaughter v. Discovery Natural Resources, LLC
as 7:2021cv00243
Plaintiff:
Bruce DeLaughter
Defendant:
Discovery Natural Resources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DeLaughter v. Sequitur Energy Resources, LLC
as 7:2021cv00242
Plaintiff:
Bruce DeLaughter
Defendant:
Sequitur Energy Resources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acevedo v. Hibernia Resources III, LLC
as 4:2021cv03691
Plaintiff:
Hervey Acevedo
Defendant:
Hibernia Resources III, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Wilkerson v. Pioneer Natural Resources Company
as 7:2021cv00192
Plaintiff:
Dale Wilkerson
Defendant:
Pioneer Natural Resources Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Karamatic v. Peyton Resource Group LP
as 3:2021cv02304
Plaintiff:
Camara Karamatic
Defendant:
Peyton Resource Group, L.P. and Peyton Resource Group LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Morgan v. Pioneer Natural Resources Company
as 7:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
Willie Morgan
Defendant:
Pioneer Natural Resources Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mitchell v. Tulsa Inspection Resources, LLC
as 1:2021cv00179
Plaintiff:
Dustin Mitchell
Defendant:
Tulsa Inspection Resources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
