Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 236
Oriska Corporation v. Highgate LTC Management, LLC
as 22-1155
Plaintiff / Appellee: Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant: Highgate LTC Management, LLC, Employer-Defendant, DBA Northwoods Rehabilitaion & Extended Care, Eugene Nachamkin, Owner-Defendant, Diana R. Koehler, Owner-Defendant and others
Defendant / Appellant: Donna Hodge, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Gedeon v. Frenchko, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00441
Plaintiff: Dawn Guarino Gedeon
Defendant: Michelle Nicole Frenchko, Trumbull County Commissioners and Board of Trumbull County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Frantz v. Collier County Board of County Commissioners
as 2:2022cv00300
Plaintiff: Joseph Frantz
Defendant: Collier County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Oriska Corporation v. Niskayuna Operating Co., LLC
as 22-1126
Plaintiff / Appellee: Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant: Niskayuna Operating Co., LLC, Employer-Defendant, Bent Philipson, Owner-Defendant, The Philipson Family Trust, Prohibited Transaction Defendants and others
Defendant / Appellant: Donna Hodge, Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appearClass Defendant, Annette Hall, Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Kimble v. DeSantis et al
as 6:2022cv01083
Plaintiff: Kamahl W. Kimble
Defendant: Ronald Dion DeSantis, Florida Department of Revenue, Department of Business & Professional Regulation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perna v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00292
Plaintiff: Anthony Perna
Defendant: Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Senne et al v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00608
Plaintiff: Lee Smith, Nick Giarraputo, Matt Frevert and others
Defendant: Pittsburgh Baseball P'ship, Cleveland Indians Basebell Co., L.P., Baltimore Orioles, L.P. and others
Intervenor: Cody Sedlock, Edwin Mateo, Luis Yarnel Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bizzell v. Clayton County, Georgia
as 1:2021cv04526
Plaintiff: Rachel Bizzell
Defendant: Clayton County Commissioners doing business as Clayton County Senior Services and Clayton County, Georgia doing business as Clayton County Senior Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
PHILLIPS v. MACON BIBB COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00355
Plaintiff: VANESSA A PHILLIPS
Defendant: MACON BIBB COUNTY GOVERNMENT and MACON BIBB TAX COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Burkel v. Union County Board of County Commissioners We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff: PATRICIA BURKEL
Defendant: UNION COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?