Cases 51 - 60 of 631
Service Employees International Union Local 121 RN v. Los Robles Regional Medical Center et al.
as 2:2022cv01368
Petitioner:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, Local 121RN and Service Employees International Union Local 121RN
Respondent:
LOS ROBLES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, a California Corporation,; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Los Robles Regional Medical Center and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. PLATINUM CLEANING OF INDIANAPOLIS, LLC
as 1:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant:
PLATINUM CLEANING OF INDIANAPOLIS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND v. TWO EAST OAK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant:
TWO EAST OAK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, STRATEGIC PROPERTIES OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC and TWO EAST OAK REALTY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
UPMC MCKEESPORT v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al
as 2:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
UPMC MCKEESPORT
Defendant:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and SEIU HEALTHCARE PENNSYLVANIA CTW, CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. UPMC MCKEESPORT
as 1:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant:
UPMC MCKEESPORT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Service Employees International Union Local 2000 Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Northview Village, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Service Employees International Union Local 2000 Health and Welfare Fund and Board of Trustees of the SEIU Local 2000 Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Northview Village, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. METRO MAN I, INC.
as 1:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant:
METRO MAN I, INC. and METRO MAN I, INC. doing business as WESTWOOD NURSING CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. AAKASH, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00956
Defendant:
AAKASH, INC., NADHI, INC., SAGAR, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. SDI SECURITY, INC.
as 1:2022cv00410
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant:
SDI SECURITY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
103 Central Park West Corporation v. Service Employees International Union, Local 32BJ et al
as 1:2021cv09255
Plaintiff:
103 Central Park West Corporation
Defendant:
Service Employees International Union, Local 32BJ and Realty Advisory Board on Labor Relations
Nominal Defendant:
Realty Advisory Board on Labor Relations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
