Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Zelma Motley v. Metro Man I, Inc.
as 23-1633
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ZELMA MOTLEY
Defendant / Appellant:
METRO MAN I, INC., dba Westwood Nursing Center
Shane Villarino, et al v. Pacesetter Personnel Service, Inc., et al
as 23-10645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE VILLARINO, LAURA KAREN JOHNSON, JEFFERY MONDY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PACESETTER PERSONNEL SERVICE, INC., PACESETTER PERSONNEL SERVICE OF FLORIDA, INC., FLORIDA STAFFING SERVICE, INC. and others
Motley v. MI-Jack Products, Inc.
as 1:2021cv05323
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Motley
Defendant:
MI-Jack Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Motley
as 2:2020cv11313
Defendant:
Metro Man I, Inc. and Westwood Nursing Center
Plaintiff:
Zelma Motley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Villarino et al v. Pacesetter Personnel Service, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv60192
Defendant:
Pacesetter Personnel Service of Florida, Inc., Pacesetter Personnel Service, Inc., Florida Staffing Service, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Mondy, Shane Villarino, Laura J Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Motley et al v. Baker Hughes, Inc
as 4:2017cv02812
Plaintiff:
Travis Motley and Edward Polasek
Defendant:
Baker Hughes, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodriguez v. Motley Services, Inc.
as 7:2017cv00123
Defendant:
Motley Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Roderick Motley v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv09444
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Motley
INNELLA v. LENAPE VALLEY FOUNDATION et al
as 2:2014cv02862
Plaintiff:
RAFFAELLA INNELLA
Defendant:
LENAPE VALLEY FOUNDATION , JEREMY MOTLEY and DOYLESTOWN HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Elias et al v. Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, LLC
as 1:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Traci Elias and Daphne Motley
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
