Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Odeh et al v. Prestige Deli and Grocery Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv05312
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Rafat Odeh
Defendant:
Abdul Rahman Elmulaki, Yasif Elmulaki, Prestige Deli and Grocery Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nashnoush v. Guidance Residential, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00632
Plaintiff:
Abdul Rahman Nashnoush
Defendant:
Guidance Residential, LLC and Khaled Elsayed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Anwar et al v. Executive Transportation Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02666
Plaintiff:
Muhammad N. Mustafa, Shahzad Qureshi, Khurram S. Cheena and others
Defendant:
Bell Radio, Inc., Avalon Corporate Car, Inc., U.S.A. Limo, Inc. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Ghazi Elreda, Rurik Meurs and Muhammed Akhtar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rahman v. Certified Payment Processing LP
as 3:2012cv00472
Plaintiff:
Faisal Abdul Rahman
Defendant:
Certified Payment Processing LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Reyes v. Buddha-Bar NYC
as 11-2982
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Arturo Reyes, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Bryon Goins, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and Armando De La Fuente Peralta, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Nina Zajic, David Kay, Abdul Rahman El Jastimi, AKA Peter Jastimi and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Little Rest Twelve, Inc.
Abubakar et al v. Prospect Airport Services, Inc
as 4:2010cv00534
Plaintiff:
Abbos Abubakar , Omar Abubakar , Aweis Abdulrahman and others
Defendant:
Prospect Airport Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reyes et al v. Buddha-Bar NYC et al
as 1:2008cv02494
Plaintiff:
Arturo Reyes, Bryon Goins and Armando De La Fuente Peralta
Defendant:
Buddha-Bar NYC, Little Rest Twelve, Inc., Nina Zajic and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
