Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Vega-Pabon v. Smith
as 6:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Raul Vega-Pabon
Defendant:
Blaise Smith
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Employment & Re-employment Rights of Uniformed Service Members
Hernandez v. Argent Trust Company et al
as 1:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Betty Hernandez
Defendant:
Argent Trust Company, James R Urbach, Ryan Sasson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Dejesus Cedeno v. Argent Trust Company et al
as 1:2020cv09987
Defendant:
Twist Financials, Duke Enterprises, Ian Behar and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Dejesus Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Clary v. Raville
as 8:2020cv02521
Defendant:
Bryttany Gardner, Paragon Systems, Inc., Nicole Denton and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CLARY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
McNeely v. Kenco Group, Inc et al
as 1:2019cv04443
Defendant:
Kenco Whirlpool, Inc., Kenco Group and Kenco Logistics
Plaintiff:
Blaise McNeely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BLAISE v. TEMPEST TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2016cv24379
Defendant:
TEMPEST TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Plaintiff:
MONAULD BLAISE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Barr v. Blaise et al
as 8:2014cv02301
Plaintiff:
Christine Barr
Defendant:
Ken Blaise and Digital Architecture
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bottini v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 3:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Peter Blaise Bottini
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Blaise v. Complete Property Services of South Florida, Inc. et al
as 0:2013cv62308
Plaintiff:
Lebrun Blaise
Defendant:
Complete Property Services of South Florida, Inc. and Pat Yong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Blaise v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 2:2013cv01251
Plaintiff:
Karen Blaise
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
