Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. CMT Roofing, LLC
as 4:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis and others
Defendant:
CMT Roofing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan et al v. CMT Roofing, LLC
as 4:2018cv02004
Plaintiff:
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan, National Roofing Industry Educational Plan, Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
CMT Roofing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. CMT Roofing, LLC
as 4:2018cv01191
Plaintiff:
AGC-Eastern Missouri Laborers' Joint Training Fund, Lou Grasse, Steve MacDonald and others
Defendant:
CMT Roofing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan et al v. CMT Roofing, LLC
as 4:2017cv01276
Plaintiff:
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan , Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund and Kinsey Robinson
Defendant:
CMT Roofing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund et al v. CMT Roofing, LLC
as 4:2016cv00087
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund and Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2 Supplemental Pension Fund
Defendant:
CMT Roofing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ruiz et al v. CMT Design Build, LLC
as 8:2016cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruben Ruiz and Audi Ruben Ruiz
Defendant:
CMT Design Build, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan et al v. CMT Roofing, LLC
as 4:2014cv02052
Plaintiff:
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan and Kinsey Robinson
Defendant:
CMT Roofing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund et al v. CMT Roofing, LLC
as 4:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund and Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2 Supplemental Pension Fund
Defendant:
CMT Roofing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund and Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineering and Participating Employers et al v. CMT Removal & Construction Inc.
as 0:2008cv01299
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund and Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineering and Participating Employers, Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund and Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineering and Participating Employers, Local #49 International Union Of Operating Engineers and Associated General Contractors of Minnesota Apprenticeship and Training Program and their Trustees and others
Defendant:
CMT Removal & Construction Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund and Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Particpating Employers et al v. CMT Removal & Construction, Inc..
as 0:2007cv03782
Plaintiff:
Local #49 Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund and Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Particpating Employers, Local #49 Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund and Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Particpating Employers, Local #49 International Union Of Operating Engineers and Associated General Contractors of Minnesota Apprenticeship and Training Program and their Trustees and others
Defendant:
CMT Removal & Construction, Inc..
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
